Glynn Edwards Verite

We have now made a video of the Glynn Edwards Hall, Acocks Green, showing the whole building, front and side, and the context with the other two Baptist buildings on this plot on the corner of Yardley Road and Alexander Road, Acocks Green: the 1913 Church and the 1903 Arthur Moore Hall either side.

 

We thought this little film would be useful in the debate, making it possible for anyone to check details, without having to rely on memory.  This is only our second experiment with a moving camera, ever, and Tom Hooper can probably sleep easy that we are not going to be a threat to his position for a while. However, we have dubbed this film ‘Glynn Edwards Verite’. This is partly because of a fragment of accidently caught chatter, but, more to the point, the aim of ‘verite’ is to accurately show what is there.  (For non Film buffs ‘ Cinema Verite’ was a French Film term which became international.  It refers to  truthful filming, using a hand held camera out in the street in a spontaneous, ‘Never mind the shake, let’s just show the raw truth.’,  style. This become famous in the 1960s, when it was popular with campaigners.)

Whilst we are on the subject of truth … because of questions which certain parties have been raised about the local listing status of the Glynn Edwards, we have double checked. It is definitely locally listed Grade A. (A quick call to BCC Planning on 0121-303 1115 will confirm this, if anyone is still in doubt on the point.)

Latest on Glynn Edwards Hall Saga – Economies with the Truth

Stockfield Community Association and Acocks Green Baptist Church have issued a response to their recent opinon survey.  Incidentally, if you have not yet completed that (see top of our previous post here)  it is clear this debate is going to run for some time – our advice would just be to get it in now anyway.

The whole of the  new three page letter from Stockfield and Acocks Green Baptists, sent those who have responded to their questionnaire is available for download by clicking here We have added a few boxes to draw your attention to controversial points.

Page 2 – Box 1 ‘The Glynn Edwards Hall is not itself listed’.  (This point is repeated several more times in the document.)  This is untrue.  The Glynn Edwards Hall is not statutorily listed.  It is locally listed Grade A.  A local listing is still a listing.  A listing at this level denotes a building of a quality capable of achieving statutory listing.  A local listing does not automatically preclude demolition.  However, what it does mean is that the Council Planning Committee will consider any plans brought before it very carefully indeed in the light of that high local listing. A plan for a replacement building can still be refused.  That SCA and AGBC are trying to conceal this local listing status is worrying.  At planning stage this point will be noted and they will not be allowed to continue to deny it.  Meantime we will be giving this present little economy with the truth maximum publicity.

Page 2 – Box 2 Which local groups have called for the destruction of the main hall space?  A number of local groups are concerned about this loss of space in an area where we have no village hall.   It would be interesting to see a list of local groups (apart, presumably, from SCA and AGBC)  who want this.

It is highly questionable whether removing the middle building is beneficial to the statutorily listed buildings on either side.  From a Conservation point of view the view of the buildings either side will be seriously affected in this exercise.  It is very interesting that it is noted that ‘Conservation focus’ (Who are they.  Could we at least try and get our terminology right?  Would that be a reference to Conservation officers by any chance?)  have been consulted.  We note that we are, ahem, not advised on what they actually said …  Come on Stockfield, come on Acocks Green Baptists.  We need a little more openness than this.

Page 3 – Box 3 ‘The vision’ does not ‘serve the prime needs of the area’ which are to have a large hall available as a village hall and to maintain that hall’s present attractive and welcoming exterior which blends in well as part of the face of  primarily Victorian to nineteen-thirties Acocks Green.   Comments we have received suggest that if this plan were to go ahead the new building would experience a down-turn in use.

Grade A Listed Glyn Edwards (Acocks Green Baptist) Hall Under Threat

Need the Stockfield/Baptist Glynn Edwards Hall  questionnaire  in a hurry?  The downloadable questionnaire is  here For why you should complete it, please read on below.

The Glyn Edwards Hall (Acocks Green Baptist Hall) 1924 Locally Listed Grade A (Side Elevation - Alexander Road)

Many Acocks Green residents have expressed horror at the present proposal put forward jointly by Acocks Green Baptist Church and Stockfield Community Association to demolish the much loved 1924, locally Grade A listed,  Glyn Edwards Hall at the corner of  Yardley Road and Alexander Road, Acocks Green.  (You can read more about local listing, and this building here.) The current proposal (we understand shortly to be put forward to Birmingham City Council Planning Department) is to demolish the hall and to replace with the design below.

The Glyn Edwards (Baptist) Church Hall Design Proposal - Artist's Impression

Below  is the present Glyn Edwards Hall, front elevation,  from Yardley Road, and the proposed Stockfield/Baptist design compared.

Double clicking will enlarge for clarity (Please ignore apparent grained effect on roof - a trick of the light.)

 

The present Glyn Edwards Hall is a distinctive Arts and Crafts Building with unusual roof features in keeping with the Arts and Crafts style where roofs are often an important part of the design.    See below for detail (Note, any of these pictures can be double clicked to enlarge.)

 

Glyn Edwards Hall - Detail

 

 

It is not hard to see why The Glyn Edwards Hall was awarded its Grade A status.  It  also has some striking brickwork patterns, see below:

 

Glyn Edwards Hall - Detail (Double click to enlarge)

The replacement building is a plain and featureless  seventies style  building with a large flat expanse of plate glass.   It has limited features of any kind and is not, in any way, in keeping with the surrounding buildings in this area.  It would jar  badly with its mainly Edwardian and nineteen-twenties surroundings in this part of Acocks Green.    Local people have already described it as a plate glass shed.

So why do Acocks Green Baptists and Stockfield Community Association want to dispose of this charming and welcoming looking building and replace it with such a bleak, souless, monstrosity?  Their rationale seems to be as follows.  We reproduce it as best as we can:

The new building would be (we quote) more ‘useful’.  The plan for the new building involves dividing it into sections – see paper plan below, followed by three dimensional model:

The Stockfield/Baptist Paper Plan for the Glyn Edwards - note double clicking will enlarge to give good clarity

This plan shows the proposed new layout, with a range of small rooms inside, to be used for different purposes.  These would replace the present large village hall style room inside, which is currently popular with local groups for meetings.  (Acocks Green lacks a parish hall.)

(Note the present Baptist buildings complex also includes 2A Alexander Road.  [Shaded pink on the plan above.]  This is the original Baptist caretaker’s house.  It is currently partly used as office space, with one flat above.  It is next to the Glyn Edwards on Alexander Road.  Next to 2A, on Alexander Road,  is the Arthur Moore Hall.  [Shaded green on the plan above.] This is the other Acocks Green Baptist Hall [here are two.] built 1903.  Next to the Glyn Edwards Hall on the Yardley Road is the Baptist Church itself  [Shaded beige on the plan above.] This is part pictured in the present and proposed front elevation pictures.)

Below is the same idea in 3D, but showing, also, how the upstairs space would be used.

 

Stockfield/Baptist Proposal for Glyn Edwards Hall (3D Model) Double click to enlarge for clarity.

The theory is clearly that a several smaller rooms would be more ‘useful’.  We are unclear about how far this theory has been tested in practice.  At a meeting about two years ago local residents involved in community work were invited to give their opinions on what would be appropriate for their needs.  At this time it was being suggested that the new facilities, already being discussed, would be designed with the needs of all residents this side of Acocks Green.  The five delegates who were not from the Baptist Church or from the Stockfield Estate did not express a strong preference for this type of division into smaller rooms, at that time, and  concerns are now being expressed that the loss of the larger hall could mean the loss of the most popular facility of this kind in the area.   There is a meeting room currently available to local groups  at 2A Alexander Road, but it would appear that, apart from Stockfield Community Association and the Baptist Church ,there is only limited use of this facility by other local residents’ groups.  It seems unclear why three small meeting rooms are now required upstairs.

This much said, we accept that if Stockfield and the Baptists can make better use of the space than is being made at present then there is an argument for changing the space arrangements inside th building.  However, what remains disturbing about the design,  even if such a division of space inside the building can be demonstrated to be ‘useful’ is the complete demolition of the building – why not simply adapt and build onto the existing one?  Much of the new design rationale seems, on further questioning, to centre on a perceived need for more light  (though the building seems already quite light enough in the daytime for most tastes) and an idea that the building would be more ‘welcoming’ if passers by could see inside it.   However, no-one we have spoken to,  finds this design ‘welcoming’.  Instead, people have been shocked by the cold, uncaring, atttitude  involved in removing, for ever, an attractive building from the local landscape, and imposing, instead, such an ugly building as this upon the community  here which contains many people who care passionately about their surroundings.   In addition, as a number of people have pointed out, plate glass windows can bring problems of their own.  They limit privacy, can make people inside a building feel uneasy and, moreover,  people have quoted local experiences in which such a large expanse of glass  has attracted unwelcome attention from bored local teenagers, eg banging on the glass.  This can be very unnerving for people trying to conduct an activity inside the building.

Finally, one of us was told ‘Well it’s our building.’  Well, yes.  It is.   This makes us sadder than anything else.  Over the years, local campaigners have heard this, final, somewhat aggressive statement many times.  Generally it comes from insensitive property developers:  ‘It is my building.  It is nothing to do with you.  I can do what I like. ‘ We would have hoped that two locally well respected organisations like Acocks Green Baptist Church and Stockfield Community Association: both organisations we have worked with before, and organisations who do much good locally, would have shown greater awareness of the feelings of the residents of Acocks Green.  Demolishing  The Glyn Edwards Hall would bring division and pain to this part of Acocks Green.   It will not be a happy outcome for anyone if these two organisations end up coming face to face with other local residents’ groups across the  Planning Committee Room floor in a wrangle over the planning proposal set out here,  and we are still hoping to avoid this.

We appeal to local residents to make their views known to Stockfield Community Association and Acocks Green Baptists now, by downloading and completing their questionnaire on the plan.  The questionnaire is available here.  It should be returned to 2A Alexander Road, B27 6HE.   We are also in the process of producing materials suitable for petition (leaflet and petition form) and have already promised one road that such materials will be available shortly.  Please contact us, using our ‘Contact Us’ link, see near top right of this website,  if you would also like petition materials.

We are  also appealing directly to Stockfield  Community Association and Acocks Green Baptists to reconsider their plans now,  before any more harm is done.   We will be writing to them separately.

Birmingham Core Strategy & Acocks Green – Your Chance to Speak

The Birmingham Core Strategy Document is a new twenty year framework plan for Birmingham with individual sections for each suburb.  Your comments are asked for.  You have until March 18 to give them.  The Acocks Green section is here and the main website for the document is here There will be an exhibition were you can make your comments at

ACOCKS GREEN LIBRARY THURSDAY 10th FEBRUARY 9.15am – 4.45pm

or at the Acocks Green Neighbourhood Forum meeting, 7.30, Thursday 10 Feburary, at the Glynn Edwards Hall (Corner of Yardley Road and Alexander Road, Acocks Green.)

If you live in the Fox Hollies Green Neighbourhood Forum area the document will be discussed at their next meeting on Monday 7 Feburary.

We give an outline of some points which affect Acocks Green, below, and our comments.

Implications of these Policies for Acocks Green.

Positive

The existing proposals for the Smart Route in the centre of Acocks Green are supported in the proposals.  There are details here that still need to be worked out but, in principle, this mean investing considerable money in the Village Centre it seems the likely first step in the development of the Smart Route through Acocks Green will be the implementation of a single carriageway in the centre, smoothing traffic flow and making the area more shopper friendly with more space for pedestrians, trees, car parking etc.  Such improvement proposals are becoming particularly urgent in the light of the new Tesco’s Development to Open in Yardley in 2012.  This development, as revealed at the Yardley Constituency meeting a few days ago will have car parking for 863, a landscaped plaza with specimen trees, and a shopping mall with 21 shops as well as the large Tesco’s shop itself.

Worrying

There is a possibility that the policy on Convenience Stores could allow another large supermarket to be developed in the vicinity.  Pointing out that supermarkets are not the only answer would help.

High levels of new housing are proposed and this is combined with high densities.  Put this together with the emphasis on protecting Mature Suburbs and Conservation Areas elsewhere and we are likely to get further, poorly designed,  high density flats and garden grabbing within an unprotected Acocks Green.  We should compare this with higher standards in Olton (e.g.  the current development on the Warwick Road in Olton, on the site of the former Fleming Hotel.

Alternatives We Could Ask For

The section on Acocks Green should recognise the high quality and unique character of the suburb and should seek to protect that so that it continues to provide the diverse range of housing requirements for its existing population and is seen as a place people aspire to live rather than one they aspire to move through on their way to Solihull. In order to help achieve this there should be a new set of policies which involve declaring Acocks Green as a Mature Suburb and parts of it as a Conservation Area. In addition a local housing market assessment should be undertaken as a priority to guide the future type and size of housing development in Acocks Green.

So: In a Nutshell we think Acocks Green should ask for:

  • Acocks Green to become a designated  Mature Suburb (which brings extra protection)
  • Parts of Acocks Green to become a Conservation Area
  • Undertake local housing market assessment for Acocks Green and not allow any new development until this is completed and then require new housing development to comply with a policy framework developed from the assessment.
  • Strengthen policy in relation to convenience shopping to restrict further supermarket development in the area.
  • Support the single carriageway proposal for the A41/Wawick Road.

Acocks Green at the moment is hanging in a balance.  We have the potential to become an area where people really want to live: one with an attractively laid out, accessible, shopping centre and and a place which preserves plenty of greenery and trees and  buildings of character … or we could retain our present busy, noisy and sometimes dangerous main High Street, with its limited parking and we could begin to lose more of our surrounding heritage with more buildings of character being demolished and more attractive suburban gardens with mature trees (visible and enjoyed by everyone) disappearing.  Your choice – join us and  send your thoughts to the  Council on the links provided above by 18 March.

Stockfield Community Association’s New Plans for Acocks Green Baptist Church Hall

Stockfield Community Association have put forward some new plans for the locally Grade A listed 1924 Acocks Green Baptist Church Hall, corner of Alexander Road and Yardley Road, B27 6HE.  (There is also a 1903 Baptist Church Hall  with entrance around the corner on Alexander Road, so we are careful to make the date distinction.)

You will find the building, with clear picture here:

Google Map

The new artist impression plans are shown here, along side the present building.  Please fast double click for larger, clearer, images.

Acocks Green Baptist Church Hall 1924 (Photo by Mike Byrne, AG History Website) and Artist's Impression 2011 Redesign for 1924 Hall (Stockfield Village News 2010-11)

The following description of this unique  building, with its strking Arts and Crafts style gable roof covered windows  is given here on the Acocks Green History Society website:

Built 1924. Red/brown brick; tile roof. Single-storey. Occupies corner site. Entrance front of asymmetrical composition with recessed door in arched opening with half-timbered gable above. Side elevation of three bays; five windows in the rhythm 1:3:1. Symmetrical composition with tall gabled bays at each end containing recessed bow windows set between brick piers under a half timber gable. Steep roof topped by Arts and Crafts style femerell with three hipped dormers. Casement windows with glazing bars throughout.

For notes on the Stockfield scheme for the building please visit the Acocks Green Neighbourhood Forum website: Landmark Development

It is possible to view and discuss these plans at the building itself on:

Friday 21 January, 1.00 pm

Friday 21 January 7.00 pm

Saturday 22nd January, 1.00 pm

UPDATED POST Save the Trees? New: News from Amey

'Essential Tree Maintenance', Please do not park within 20 meters either side of this tree, Sunday 9th January 7.30 am, 3.30 pm - click to enlarge.

The main tree related event on the Acocks Green calandar this month was the planting  of a new tree on Acocks Green’s green space, The Westley Vale Millenium Green, by Lord Mayor Len Gregory.   This was  followed by a blessing ritual for the site.  Toasts were ceremoniously hung from an oak tree and  Pagan wasailling … including singing, the scattering of cider and a cande light processsion -  all to help the trees grow.  The ceremony went off splendidly.

Pagan Wasailling, Westley Vale Millenium Green, Acocks Green

However, on their way to this celebration of Acocks Green’s trees, some Focus Group members photographed,  in Yardley Road, the  notice  displayed on a tree and reproduced at the top of this post.   This  had already set people in Acocks Green talking.  There were two more of these notices in the immediate vicinity, on two more large mature trees.  What was going on?  With such limited information, such a huge gap to be cleared, extremely short notice (The notices  appeared about 36 hours before the promised event.) , no way at all of contacting Amey (we tried) and a published Council schedule of tree work that made no mention of Yardley Road, concerns quickly deepened.  Were we about to lose some of  our mature trees?

Acocks Green people love their trees: see above and also the longer History.  The Focus Group came about partly because of some genuine threats to trees in the centre of Acocks Green.   The affection of Acocks Gren for its trees was swiftly  demonstrated  again. Emergency plans were put in to place  to deter Amey until Monday morning, if necessary, and pending proper discussions.   Fortunately, this proved to be a false alarm.  The lower branches of the trees canopies were being ‘lifted’ slightly so that street lighting was not obscured.  All resistance plans were quickly cancelled (The internet, with a little telephone backup,  can be a wonderful thing … )

This clearly left some questions to be answered though.  Why were Amey displaying cryptic, and, frankly, scarey notices like this at such short notice?

We have now had detailed discussions with Amey area Rep Jason Bickley, and Amey Yardley Area Manager Calvin Richardson.

They say

  • The missing correct number for Jason Bickley is 0797 187 9059.
  • Jason would not have been available at the weekend anyway.
  • However they take the point that the notices were ill thought out.  In future notices like this on trees should be going up around two weeks in advance of any work, and will display emergency contact details.
  • Amey are not intending to remove any healthy mature trees in Birmingham.
  • Since taking over tree maintenance for the Council Amey have recently completed a survey of all street trees in Birmingham.  Apparently they are around 80,000 trees.  Such a survey has not previously been carried out on this scale.  All these trees are now noted on a GPS map.
  • There will be a new five year programme for trees, to replace BCC’s present three year programme.  Each tree has been surveyed to see what is required by way of maintenance, pruning etc.
  • Trees will only be removed if they are dangerous.  No tree in the whole of the Yardley Constituency has been assessed as dangerous, so there should be no tree removal.

The new tree programme will be up for Consultation shortly, probably at the next Yardley Constituency meeting.  (27 January, 2010) Presumably the plans will also appear at other Constituency meetings in Birmingham.

Additional comment on this issue can also be found on Acocks Green Ward Councillor Roger Harmer’s blog here.

Manual for Streets 2 Presentation in Acocks Green: 8 December 2010

Stage 1 - Tidy Up

Stage 5 - Re-create the Street

Note: these are pictures from the Manual for Streets Presentation given at Acocks Green Library, 8 December 2010.  The full Powerpoint  presentation from that meeting is now available in three parts.   You can now download them here:

MfS2 – Acocks Green Powerpoint Part 1 of 3 – Slides 1-80

MfS2 – Acocks Green Powerpoint  Part 2 of 3 – Slides 81- 100

MfS2 – Acocks Green Powerpoint – Part 3 of 3 – Slides 101-123

Street design design expert, and co-author of Manual for Streets 2, Phil Jones, gave a very detailed and informative presentation to a highly attentive audience in Acocks Green Library on 8 December 2010.

Phil outlined how up until recently traffic engineers have been working from engineering guidance manuals which were never designed for situations like that in Acocks Green, but were designed for busy trunk roads.  The new message in the government sponsored Manual for Streets 2 is that an urban village street is not merely a route to somewhere else.  It is a place in its own right, and should be treated as such.  We have been saying this in Acocks Green for six years now; we are not merely part of the route between  Birmingham City Centre and Solihull.  Our local centre is the heart of our community, but has  suffered from the failure of Birmingham City Council to recognise this fact.

Phil Jones

Phil went on to explain that Manual for Streets 2 (MfS2) does not recommend removal of all traffic.   Areas can loose their vibrancy when this happens.  Instead, traffic needs to be better integrated with the other functions of the street, and the balance of priorities needs to be changed.   When it comes to traffic paraphenalia the MfS2 philosophy is that less is very frequently more.   Urban high streets do not need to be dominated by traffic signs, traffic markings, traffic lights and the notorious guard rail cages which the Department for Transport is now, itself, increasingly advising against the use of   (See their new 2009 guidance here) The presence of guard rails and bollards – things we are all too familiar with in Acocks Green -  have been shown to increase speeds.

Illegally parked cars is often a big fear but there are other ways …

Blocking cars without barriers

Blocking cars without the use of barriers

On the other hand, speeds  of cars are typically reduced by methods like introducing slight visual obstructions.   Planters and steeper bends can be as effective as traditional traffic markings.  Reducing strict segregation between traffic and pedestrians tends, also, to result in more smoothly flowing traffic with more pedestrians feeling empowered to use the whole of the space.  This has also been shown to increase the number of pedestrians in the street as a whole.

News which was particularly interesting to this audience was that a recent Department for Transport study – hot of the presses from a conference Phil had been at that day in London -  confirms that Shared Space (one style of street design which emphasises reducing pedestrian/traffic segregation)  is ‘no less safe and can be safer’.

Widening pavements also increases pedestrian useage of the area whilst narrowing roads reduces speed.  This point is something which, again, is particularly relevant to an Acocks Green audience who  is currently endorsing a BCC scheme to remove most of the dual carriageway on the Warwick Road in Acocks Green.   Most of us have, at some point, stood near Sainsbury’s and watched with despair as the traffic begins to speed up as it hits the wide dual section.

Many older streets lose their sense of History when modern street layouts and furniture are imposed upon them.

Historic street - cluttered

The atmosphere of such streets can often be retrieved by a sensitive stripping down of recent additions and, again, a more sympathetic use of materials.

Historic street - de-cluttered

This is an issue in Acocks Green, where good buildings from the nineteen-twenties and thirties are obscured by modern railings, bollards and street signs: a point, which interestingly, also attracted spontaneous comment from non-Acocks Green members of the audience!

Boris Johnson also proved a hit with his idea of a five point approach to better streets:

  • Tidy up
  • De-clutter – remove unecessary features
  • Re-locate/merge functions – e.g. put signs/bins on lamposts
  • Re-think traffic management – e.g. make it unobtrusive
  • Re-create the street – e.g. upgrade materials

The audience stayed well beyond the scheduled finishing time of 8.30 pm in order to hear, and very actively discuss ,these new ideas. Such ideas are now radicalising urban street design, helping to make urban high streets once again a  popular places for people to visit and spend time in, at a time when the local high street has been under threat of disappearing.    Acocks Green was well represented in the audience, but there were also delegates from other areas like Moseley and Harborne, from Birmingham City Council, Friends of the Earth and Living Streets.  The evening was rounded off by Andy Chidgey from BCC informally explaining his recent plans for Acocks Green.   (See our previous posting) When asked whether he had found the evening interesting Andy agreed that there were many ideas which worth thinking about.

We hope that Manual for Streets 2 will help to shape the new, revitalised, Acocks Green centre which we look forward to see emerging in the next few years.

Acocks Green Centre – New Plans and Manual for Streets 2

Acocks Green: Warwick Road: the Dual Carriageway ... speeding car

Well: we have been talking now for eighteen months or so about the  ‘Smart Route’: a combination of Red Route and enhanced bus route which has been put forward as a possibility for the Warwick Road (A41) through Acocks Green centre.  It seems  something is about to happen.  The much awaited West Midlands Local Transport Plan is out.  You can download and read the difference  sections here According to p. 105  of the ‘Draft Strategy Appendices’ in this plan:

Smart Routes require a change to the way in which network wide initatives  are developed and funded.  As a result, a pilot Smart Route has been progressed to develop a set of guidelines that can be adapted for the future development of the network

The A41 Warwick Road, between Birmingham and Solihull, was selected as the pilot route. This is being jointly developed by Birmingham and Solihull Councils, and Centro.

Meantime, the new final draft of the  Birmingham Core Strategy document, under discussion until January 2011 goes on to note (p. 185, Section 8.37, E4 Acocks Green) that key objectives for Acocks Green include:

  • To encourage the evolution of the centre in accordance with local need.  This would include the consideration of opportunities for potential growth and the enhancement of gateways into the centre, particularly ‘The Green’.
  • To complement the emerging proposals under the A41 ‘Smart Route’ pilot study.
  • To improve accessibility and parking within the local centre and the adjacent residential areas.

(If you would like further clarification you can download the Core Strategy document, which gives the present plans for the whole of Birmingham here. We are promised that public consultation will follow from mid December for a period of 12 weeks – further details to follow when available.)

OK so what, in plain English, does all of this mean for Acocks Green?  The Smart Route is going to happen.  Could this be good for Acocks Green?  Will this help to ‘improve accessibility and parking in the local centre?’ for example?  We  have the latest plans available to download below.   Andy Chidgey, the Project leader has confirmed to us that the key finding after consultation with local people is that the number one priority  is redesigning the present the dual cariageway Warwick Road through Acocks Green.  Almost everyone seems to agree that positive effects from this would include more space for parking, more space for local people  and – we hope -   some attractive additions like trees!  At the same time we would loose  the present Brands Hatch speedway effect (see above) which has always sat oddly in the centre of a small urban village shopping centre.

What do Andy’s new (DRAFT)  plans for Acocks Green look like?  You can download and view all four of them here.   The first two are options for the dual carriageway: retaining  but modifying to traffic going one way in each direction and using the central reservation for trees, seating etc (1) or  modifying to traffic one way in either direction but also removing the central reservation to create wider footways and additional parking (2)

The second pair of pdfs  show two different new options for The Green itself.  We think these are easy to understand and there are detailed notes  on the plans showing how aspects are intended to work.  We think these plans may still need further discussion, but it seems that ‘de-dualling’ has now been set to be the first priority.

(1) Warwick Road, Acocks Green, Dual Carriageway Option

(2) Warwick Road, Acocks Green, Single Carriageway Option

(3) Warwick Road Acocks Green, \’Roundabout Option\’

(4) Warwick Road, Acocks Green, \’Roundabout with Traffic Signals\’ option

Andy is also keen to emphasise that ‘Manual for Streets 2′ may become  part of the Birmingham City Council vision for Acocks Green: ‘There are a number of things within it that we could use in Acocks Green and elsewhere.’ Manual for Streets 2, using the very latest safety research,  approaches street design in the new, ‘de-cluttered’ way that is being widely discussed at present.  More will be explained on Wednesday 8 December at Acocks Green Library.  See our previous posting below this one, or view it here

Presentation in Acocks Green on Manual for Streets 2

NEW: Download Poster for Acocks Green or poster for anywhere for this event.

The fate of Acocks Green centre is currently in the hands of politiicans, traffic engineer and concerned Acocks Green people.   Will we get the changes that have been needed for thirty years?  Acocks Green Focus Group is pleased to announce that at 6.30 pm,  on 8 December there will be a presentation in Acocks Green Library on the important new publication Manual for Streets 2. This is a Government sponsored document aimed at bringing about some radical changes in thinking in the design and layout of urban high streets like ours in Acocks Green.   The main speaker will be Phil Jones of Phil Jones Associates, with a supporting presentation fron Acocks Green Focus Group.

In 2007 new guide lines for traffic engineers and others involved in the planning and design of streets were produced by the Department for Transport in conjunction with the Department for Communities and Local Government and CABE (Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment).  These guidelines called  Manual for Streets (see our link on the right.) stressed the latest research on safety, and the needs of good community.  They advocated a less heavily cluttered and more aesthetic street style with easier access for pedestrians.  However,  whilst these ideas were always relevant to problems in Acocks Green,  the manual concentrated mainly on residential streets with low traffic.

In October of this year Manual for Streets 1 was followed by the much awaited Manual for Streets 2.  This continues much of the approach of Manual for Streets 1 but is now targetted on urban shopping centres, like ours.   Our main speaker, Phil Jones is one of the authors of both Manual for Streets 1 and Manual for Streets 2.  He will be explaining the principles behind Manual for Streets 2 and, in the light of the current discussions already going on,  we will consider how some of the ideas in Manual for Streets 2 could work in our own centre in Acocks Green.   However, delegates from elsewhere may also be interested to consider their application in their own in, or around, Birmingham.

More details to follow, but please feel free to contact us now (See our ‘Contact Us’ page on the right) to book your (free) place.

Why do we want Shared Space for Acocks Green? See Ben Hamilton-Baillie’s Talk on Shared Space

Acocks Green Focus group supports the concept of Shared Space.  This, ultimately, is what we would like to see in the centre of Acocks Green.  Have you heard this phrase bandied about but wondered exactly what it means in practice?  Here leading UK Shared Space proponent, Ben Hamilton-Baillie, shows  Shared Space in operation in many locations.    Ben explains how and why Shared Space works to improve both the community  atmosphere and the safety levels of town and village centres.    He has given similar presentations in Acocks Green, and also believes that Shared Space would be a good choice for Acocks Green:  not the comments on Drachten, another area with a central island and a number of feeder roads,  towards the end of the talk.  You can watch and listen to Ben’s twenty minute show on Shared Space (On Rudi-net)  here

If you want to know more check out the Ben Hamilton-Baillie website, and our other Shared Space links on the right, or follow Ben on Twitter:  @benhbaillie