<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old Swan Centre, Yardley: Knight Adams Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acocksgreenfocusgroup.org.uk/2010/02/07/old-swan-centre-yardley-knight-adams-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acocksgreenfocusgroup.org.uk/2010/02/07/old-swan-centre-yardley-knight-adams-website/</link>
	<description>Working for Acocks Green: A Conservation and Re-Design Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:09:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DocDelete</title>
		<link>http://acocksgreenfocusgroup.org.uk/2010/02/07/old-swan-centre-yardley-knight-adams-website/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>DocDelete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acocksgreenfocusgroup.org.uk/?p=750#comment-769</guid>
		<description>I can see one major problem with the proposal - the traffic / pedestrian clash caused by creating a crossroads into the shrivelled park area. A dual carriageway that will carry heavy peak loads, mixing it up with a so-called pedestrian linkage? A crossing doesn&#039;t appear to be in the 3d rendering. Sink the road under at this point!

I&#039;m not sure that having the car parking at a remove from the foodstore threshold is sensible either. In an ideal world people shouldn&#039;t complain about trundling shopping trolleys a few extra meters, but they will - and across a so-called public square?

It all looks nice, but I am surprised at how simple logistical issues like these can be overlooked. Or am *I* overlooking something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see one major problem with the proposal &#8211; the traffic / pedestrian clash caused by creating a crossroads into the shrivelled park area. A dual carriageway that will carry heavy peak loads, mixing it up with a so-called pedestrian linkage? A crossing doesn&#8217;t appear to be in the 3d rendering. Sink the road under at this point!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that having the car parking at a remove from the foodstore threshold is sensible either. In an ideal world people shouldn&#8217;t complain about trundling shopping trolleys a few extra meters, but they will &#8211; and across a so-called public square?</p>
<p>It all looks nice, but I am surprised at how simple logistical issues like these can be overlooked. Or am *I* overlooking something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
